oh dear... that won't do...
urwerk have come up with some great pieces in the past, looking at the ultra sexy 103 and 202 series of watches. the uber cool harry winston opus V... so one would think they can do no wrong, right?...


raphmeisters horological weavings ...
advancing the love of horology ;)
and musings on life, love and other passions
If you don't like what you read here, do feel free to go to other sites
urwerk have come up with some great pieces in the past, looking at the ultra sexy 103 and 202 series of watches. the uber cool harry winston opus V... so one would think they can do no wrong, right?...


Posted by
raphmeister
at
23:37
2
comments
Ok so u just bought the latest n greatest complication from company X who has trumpeted its new technical marvel developed by their in-house crack team of experts or a wunderkind genius n u bring it home wif much joy n a much lighter wallet (horological wizardy does not come cheap) and then...
Posted by
raphmeister
at
20:57
0
comments
internet travels that is... some watches of note in my surfing this past week... and some comments...













Posted by
raphmeister
at
20:13
0
comments
now a lot of times theres a lot of bs out there about this watch is art, that watch is art... every d@mn watch with a ludicrous price tag is art... well, a lot of it as noted, is a hot steaming pile of BS and one just has to be a bit more discerning and cut thru the marketing hyperbole and superlatives hype etc etc etc... and with the super high margins seen in some brands offerings, you must understand that the people selling this 'art' to you are masters of the art of BS. they are the ice sellers to the eskimos... the air-conditioner salesmen to northen alaskan dwellers ;) but they razzle dazzle you instead with concepts, false innovations, and emotive dark arts... their magick is potent allowing for a $500 watch to sell for $15-30k. or a $1000 watch sell for $50k.









Posted by
raphmeister
at
12:10
0
comments







Posted by
raphmeister
at
12:02
0
comments


but before i begin my rave about this watch, i would like to thank the fine folks at vacheron constantin ably led by david heng for asia and the folks from cortina for the invite to this very nice dinner affair at mimolette...
my dinner companions for the night were stefano and jim and we had a fine time talkin about watches and life :) the singer and the jazz band were outstanding and the food was decent and most importantly the watches were excellent... this years watches from VC were really nice in the metal, none more so than the american and the simple classy traditionelle with subsidiary seconds. for some strange reason, the patrimony chrono never made it round to our table and I am not even sure if it was there... its a shame if it was and i missed it but the good thing from that is i have one less watch to lust after ;) hope to see it someday though... ok, enough rambling... some words and pics from the nite follow...
a screen in front of the dining area and where i was facing most of the nite... 
bombarding me with the following images... making me salivate :p this picture in particular was calling out to me wif a siren song... 


















Posted by
raphmeister
at
22:09
3
comments
[ before i begin this review, please note i WILL BE slagging off certain brand's watches. now this is not to say i dislike ALL the watches in these brands ranges, there are many that i like and love in these brands ranges, its just stating my view of these specific models in their stable, all in a rather tongue-in-cheek manner...as i would really be fine wif owning all of them if i had the dosh :) so even though the criticisms may sound harsh at times, take a chill pill, relax and just read on ;) ]
i admit it, i am biased :) i like my own watches the most which is why i own them. but at the same time i can try to be objective... the question posed is this, which is the ultimate haut de gamme sports watch... of course the contenders will be audemars piguet, patek philippe and vacheron constantin. the rest of the big name houses do try but they're not really anywhere are they? oh and for this head to head, its not how deep u can go in the sea with it that matters yuh. the 'how much of a head turner factor' comes more into play ;)
the contenders in the 70s, 80s would be the standard Royal Oak Jumbo 15202, the Patek Nautilus and the VC 222, all designed by Gerald Genta. of this lot the royal oak is the king. the rest are trying to beat it and get a slice of its crown but hey, they'll always remain contenders regardless how high u price them.
in this day and age it should be the Royal Oak Offshore(updated by Emmanuel Gueit originally with subsequent dial updates), the Patek Nautilus 5712 and the VC Overseas Dual Time(the vc overseas chrono just is a bit of a minger). Each sport a complication, chrono for the offshore, moonphase and PR for the Patek and dual time and PR for the VC and each are larger than their classic styled cousins and offered in steel as well as other metals. a wild card thrown in is the Richard Mille 005/10, base time and date only RMs but at the price of these watches only coming in golds and titanium make it a logical contender. at the extreme of it all is the countless number of AP limited editions wif a focus on one of the more recent, overly-aggressive, over-the-top piece, the Audemar Piguet Survivor... so lets get to it...
first then... the defender :) the 'base' royal oak offshore
whats good about it?
1) its got a great look. a fantastic upgrade from the lovely royal oak. a winning design enhanced the right way.
2) its not soo extremely oversized like some watches out there. interestingly if you compare it with the oversized brigade that came after it, it doesn't wear too huge... or it may be just me having gotten very comfortable with the size :)
3) good bang for buck as compared to others here
whats bad about it?
1) its got a teeny tiny movement in an oversized case for the movement. they got round this by saying its got the anti-magnetic iron cover but we know dats just some justification... not that we need it mind you :) [for the other watches, i don't think their movement are all that big too yuh so this point applies for some of the others...]
2) the movement is not a great chrono movement now is it. the base time calibre JLC 889 based AP is fine but its mated with a dubois depraz chrono module and because it ain't integrated, it has a magnifier over the date which isn't all too great. modular movements are also known to have some pecularities eg. stuff jumping on start/stop/reset of chrono... again, does it really matter? if u want your fine movement pieces go for your classic pateks, langes, dufour and voutilainens :)
3) the biggest problem is its the base model in a successful lineup. if you're going for flash, this won't do now will it? :) at S$20+k its just not expensive enuff... but of course this only matters to those who buy it to be showy and not because its really really good lookin and a great haut de gamme sports watch... which it is...




this one is the best of the lot for the nautilus range in my books...

the ostentatious boys... richard mille rm005/rm10
whats good about it?
1) its loud. c'mon now... u don't buy these watches to be discreet now do you? for that u go with the classic styled pieces... for this, you want people to stare at your wrist and go "DAMN! he's got an RM on. thats freakin cool... must hv cost a bomb!' this sorta reaction puts a smile on the RM wearers face as he pulls up to the club in his yellow lamborghini... discreet... very discreet ;)
whats bad about it?
1) its loud. everyone who sees you will be thinking 'look at that wanker with his flashy RM. u think only u can afford an expensive watch?' but pay no attention. some will have more wealth than u and some won't but does it matter now really? of course if u had real $$$ u would not buy a base RM, it has to be the RM4v2 at minimum now, doesn't it ;)





the try... vc overseas
whats good about it?
1) the styling of the bracelet and the generous doses of the maltese cross logo styling all over. nice guilloche dial on the steel pieces, cool dual time function. gorgeous in rose gold and choc brown dial.
whats bad about it?
1) its quite weak in the metal. the whole idea should work but somehow its not something that grabbed me and said u gotta get me... with a bracelet in gold it weighs a ton which means it feels like a million bucks but you'll get a proper workout from wearing one. just not worth it and the weakest amongst these lot (please note i really really like other VCs :) do check out their 2009 lineup for the patrimony traditionelle chrono and small seconds... those are VERY COOL or VC get it :) kekekeke [sorry about the corniness :) ]
the minger... vc overseas chrono... i dun have any pics of choc dialled dual time rg handy unfortunately...
the wrong kind of evolution... the AP royal oak offshore survivor
whats good about it?
1) its got some royal oak offshore styling... meaning it is built off a good base but then it goes pretty awfully wrong very fast...
2) people who buy this are saying very clearly... i am able to get a hot limited edition from AP and i have money, i am a boy who likes his toys but don't necessarily have a lot of taste. (oops i think that last part is in the category below)
whats bad about it?
1) have you seen the gun barrel of a crown???!!! and the shiny things on it to make them seem like night sights!! Gawd! its a watch designed by a teenager with an army fixation. buzz haircut and loadsa gi joe toys... its just sooo wrong.
2) over-the-top, over-designed, overkill, extremely contrived and just not an End of Days(i.e. the right way to do an LE ;) of course not at current prices which are 4x what it was released at)
3) a thousand pieces and its limited? limited used to mean 50 or 100 pieces... a 1000 pieces!? if u wear it on your yacht in monaco during the f1 race, 6 out of your 10 neighbours could have one on and we cant have that now can we... even if the ladies on your boat are way finer than theirs ;)
4) AP ROO limited edition?... like it matters as theres gonna be another 5 RO/ROO limited editions next year and the year after that and the after that year etc etc etc... its kinda takin the piss or killing the goose that laid them golden eggs... over milkin it in a big way...
the wrong end of a gun barrel... ok ok it ain't that bad... or is it... hmm...




a much better recent LE... but some may also find it over-designed in some way... it was nice to me initially but its desirability has also worn off with me somewhat...
every year new alinghis as long as AP is tied with them... whats so hot about that? 


Posted by
raphmeister
at
20:48
10
comments